Your website has a score. Nobody has ever told you what it is.

Fourteen technical checks decide whether Google understands your page, and whether your link looks like anything when a customer shares it. Mine scored 43. I had no idea.

Get my site scored From $75 · report back in 3 days

I built this studio’s own website and I was proud of it.

Then I ran my own checks on it and it scored 43 out of 100.

A missing image file had been quietly breaking every link preview the site ever produced.

Not for a week. For months. Every time somebody shared it in a text or a group chat, it showed a blank grey box, and nothing anywhere told me. That’s the thing about these checks. They don’t break loudly. They just quietly cost you the people who were already interested.

This is the report, running on my own site.

Fourteen checks. Keep scrolling and watch it work.

nextloopco.com 43/100

Page title, the right length
Meta description present
Exactly one H1
Mobile viewport set
Language declared
Canonical URL
Open Graph title
Share image exists, not just linked
Business details marked up for Google
Alt text on every image
Tap-to-call link on mobile
Homepage under 1.5 MB
robots.txt and a working sitemap
Secure address and load speed

Run on nextloopco.com. Every check is a real pass or fail, not a rating out of five.

Three ways to do this.

The report is the same at every tier. What changes is how much of the work I do for you.

The report $75 3 days

One site, up to 10 pages crawled
All 14 checks, scored
Fixes ranked by what they cost you
A short video walkthrough, me going through your actual site

For: you have a developer, or you want to do it yourself.

The report, plus the top 5 fixed $220 5 days

Everything in the report
I implement the five that matter most
I re-run the score so you see before and after

For: most people. You want it fixed, not explained.

Everything fixed, and tracked $450 14 days

Everything above
Every fix implemented to a 90+ score
My cookieless visitor tracker installed
A 30-day report after, and one change I’d make next

For: you want to know what happens next, not just what was wrong.

If you hire me to build the site afterwards, the audit price comes off it. And if your site already scores well, I’ll tell you so and refund you down to the $75 tier. I’d rather have the review than the difference.

What actually happens.

You send me a web address.That’s the whole ask. No call needed, no forms to fill in, nothing to install.
I run the checks and verify them by hand.Automated tools get things wrong. I look at what they flag before it reaches you.
You get the score, the list and a video.Ranked by what each one is costing you, not by how many there are. In plain English, so you can act on it or hand it to someone who can.

Who this is for, and who it isn’t.

It’s for you if

You have a website and no idea whether it’s technically sound.
People find you through Google, maps or a shared link.
You want to know what’s wrong before you spend money on a rebuild.
You’d rather be told the truth plainly than sold a retainer.

It isn’t for you if

You want to rank first for a competitive keyword. That’s a different job and a much longer one.
You want link building or content written. I don’t do either.
You already know your site is broken and just want it rebuilt. Skip this and ask me about a build.
You want a number you can put in a pitch deck. This produces a fix list, not a trophy.

If you’re in the second column, say so and I’ll point you at someone who does that properly. I’d rather do that than take the money.

The questions I get asked.

Will this get me to the top of Google?

No, and anyone promising that is selling you something. This fixes the technical foundation that has to be right before anything else works, and it tells you honestly where you stand. That’s all it does, and it’s worth doing.

What if my site scores well already?

Then I’ll tell you that and refund you down to the $75 tier. I’d rather have the honest review than the difference.

Is this just an automated tool?

The checks are automated. The reading of them is not. Automated tools flag things that don’t matter and miss things that do, so I go through the results by hand before you see them. That’s the part you’re paying for.

Do I need to give you access to my site?

Not for the report. For the two tiers where I implement fixes, I need access to edit the site, or an introduction to whoever can.

Does the fee come off a full build?

Yes. If you hire me to build or rebuild the site afterwards, the audit price comes off it.

Why is this cheaper than the rest of your work?

Because the checks are already built and they run in minutes. I wrote them for my own builds, so nothing goes live here scoring under 90. The cost to me is the reading and the writing up, not the running.

Send me the address.

I’ll tell you what it scores and what I’d fix first. If it turns out there’s nothing worth charging you for, I’ll say that too.

Every site I build has to clear 90 on these same checks before it goes live. This one scores 100.